Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Avery v. Midland County.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Avery v. Midland County Anchor | green | “the equal protection clause does not, of course, require that the state never distinguish between citizens, but only that the distinctions that are made not be arbitrary or invidious.” | 8 |
| 2 | Sgitcovich v. Sgitcovich | green | “the requirement of due process of law is met if the notice prescribed affords the party a fair opportunity to appear and defend his interests.” | 4 |
| 3 | Morris v. State | green | “due process requires only that the method of notice be reasonably calculated, under the circumstances, to apprise the interested parties of the pendency of the action.” | 3 |
| 4 | Granek v. Texas State Board of Medical Examiners | green | “claims regarding deprivation of constitutional rights present questions of law, and we accordingly review them de novo.” | 3 |
| 5 | Star Houston, Inc. v. Texas Department of Transportation, Motor Vehicle Division | green | “until an agency issues an effective final order, the agency retains jurisdiction over the matter and can withdraw previous orders and issue new ones.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.