Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Montana v. Egelhoff.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Montana v. Egelhoff Anchor | green | “offend some principle of justice so rooted in the traditions and conscience of our people as to be ranked as fundamental.” | 13 |
| 2 | Joseph Cooper v. Dewey Sowders, Warden, Northpoint Training Center | green | “errors in the application of state law, especially rulings regarding the admission or exclusion of evidence, are usually not to be questioned in a federal habeas corpus proceeding.” | 8 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.