Topic: nepa imposes procedural requirements designed to force agen… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #19192

7 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Barnes v. United States Department of Transportation.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Barnes v. United States Department of Transportation Anchor
ca9 · 2011
green “nepa imposes procedural requirements designed to force agencies to take a "hard look” 3
2 Edwardsen v. U.S. Dept. of Interior
ca9 · 2001
green “(1) formulation of a five year leasing plan by the department of the interior; (2) lease sales; (3) exploration by the lessees; and (4) development and production.” 3
3 Edwardsen v. U.S. Dept. of Interior
ca9 · 2001
green “contains a reasonably thorough discussion” 3
4 Edwardsen v. U.S. Dept. of Interior
ca9 · 2001
green “we review an environmental impact statement under a rule of reason to determine whether it contains a reasonably thorough discussion” 3
5 United States v. Jonathon Marc Sutter
ca9 · 2003
green “providing sufficient detail to foster informed decision-making” 3
6 Northern Alaska Environmental Center v. Kempthorne
ca9 · 2006
green “improperly minimizing negative side effects.” 3
7 Northern Alaska Environmental Center v. Kempthorne
ca9 · 2006
green “the area has high oil resource potential and there is existing transportation infrastructure to move oil from northern alaska to distant markets.” 3

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check