Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 150 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Andrews v. Merritt Oil Co., Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Andrews v. Merritt Oil Co., Inc. Anchor | green | “this court cannot consider arguments raised for the first time on appeal; rather, our review is restricted to the evidence and arguments considered by the trial court.” | 83 |
| 2 | Butler v. Town of Argo | green | “it is not the function of this court to do a party's legal research or to make and address legal arguments for a party based on undelineated general propositions not supported by sufficient authority or argument.” | 34 |
| 3 | Figures v. Figures | green | “factors to be considered by the trial court when awarding such fees include the financial circumstances of the parties, the parties' conduct, the results of the litigation, and, where appropriate, the trial court's knowledge and experience as to the value of the services perform…” | 20 |
| 4 | Taylor v. Taylor | green | “glover v. glover, 678 so.2d 174, 176 (ala.civ.app.1996).” | 7 |
| 5 | Watts v. Watts | green | “the purpose of a civil contempt proceeding is to effectuate compliance with court orders and not to punish the contemnor.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.