Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Griselda Jauregui v. Roadrunner Transportation Serv.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Griselda Jauregui v. Roadrunner Transportation Serv Anchor | green | “a defendant's amount in controversy allegation is normally accepted . . . unless it is 'contested by the plaintiff or questioned by the court.” | 10 |
| 2 | Levone Harris v. Km Industrial, Inc. | green | “a defendant may rely on reasonable assumptions to prove that it has met the statutory threshold.” | 8 |
| 3 | Morris v. Hotel Riviera, Inc. | green | “a rule of law or measure of damages limits the amount of damages recoverable.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.