Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Ioan Sofinet v. Immigration and Naturalization Service.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ioan Sofinet v. Immigration and Naturalization Service Anchor | green | “it is not enough that the chance of success on the merits be 'better than negligible,” | 5 |
| 2 | United States v. Reynold De La Torre | green | “generally known,' at least to us.” | 4 |
| 3 | United States v. Reynold De La Torre | green | “the fed- eral rules of evidence permit a court to take judicial notice of a fact that is 'not subject to reasonable dispute' because it is 'generally known' or 'can be accurately and readily deter- mined from sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned.” | 4 |
| 4 | United States v. Reynold De La Torre | green | “were not subject to daubert no. 20-1792 25 challenges, cross-examined, or tested with competing expert testimony.” | 4 |
| 5 | C.Y. Wholesale, Inc. v. Eric Holcomb | green | “a factual or legal error may alone be sufficient to establish that the court 'abused its discretion' in making its final deter- mination.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.