Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Hill.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Hill Anchor | green | “has as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person or property of another.” | 10 |
| 2 | Howard Krantz v. United States | green | “substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” | 7 |
| 3 | United States v. Hill | green | “hobbs act robbery 'has as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person or property of another.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.