Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 148 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from T.Y. Ex Rel. T.Y. v. New York City Department of Education.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | T.Y. Ex Rel. T.Y. v. New York City Department of Education Anchor | green | “a nonmoving party's failure to respond to a rule 56.1 statement permits the court to conclude that the facts asserted in the statement are uncontested and admissible.” | 60 |
| 2 | McPherson v. New York City Department of Education | green | “speculation alone is insufficient to defeat a motion for summary judgment.” | 42 |
| 3 | Docket No. 01-7686 | green | “does not impose an obligation on a district court to perform an independent review of the record to find proof of a factual dispute.” | 29 |
| 4 | Monahan v. New York City Department Of Corrections | green | “while the trial court has discretion to conduct an assiduous review of the record in an effort to weigh the propriety of granting a summary judgment motion, it is not required to consider what the parties fail to point out.” | 17 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.