Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Watson v. Department of the Navy.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Watson v. Department of the Navy Anchor | green | “the six bingaman factors may also be considered as necessary and appropriate.” | 3 |
| 2 | Louis D. Hall, Sr. v. Department of the Treasury | green | “no single factor is essential or dispositive.” | 3 |
| 3 | Anderson v. United States | red | “every administrative device and the tone and content of instructions were so cast as to imply (if not overtly to state)” | 3 |
| 4 | Anderson v. United States | red | “under most unusual circumstances.” | 3 |
| 5 | Albright v. United States | green | “a 'tacit expectation' is not equivalent to the statutory requirement of 'official order or approval.” | 3 |
| 6 | Adams v. United States | green | “he was directly ordered by his command to increase days and hours of the special service facilities at the base, yet at the same time suffered a steady loss of staff to help him keep the facilities open and running.” | 3 |
| 7 | Baylor v. United States | green | “officially ordered or approved,” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.