Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Norman Ottmann v. Hanger Orthopedic Group, Incorporated Ivan R. Sabel Richard A. Stein v. David Chopko Gary Backous, Movant-Appellants.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Norman Ottmann v. Hanger Orthopedic Group, Incorporated Ivan R. Sabel Richard A. Stein v. David Chopko Gary Backous, Movant-Appellants Anchor | green | “an act so highly unreasonable and such an extreme departure from the standard of ordinary care as to present a danger of misleading the plaintiff to the extent that the danger was either known to the defendant or so obvious that the defendant must have been aware of it.” | 11 |
| 2 | Norman Ottmann v. Hanger Orthopedic Group, Incorporated Ivan R. Sabel Richard A. Stein v. David Chopko Gary Backous, Movant-Appellants | green | “so highly unreasonable and such an extreme departure from the standard of ordinary care as to present a danger of misleading the plaintiff to the extent that the danger was either known to the defendant or so obvious that the defendant must have been aware of it.” | 6 |
| 3 | Robert Yates v. Municipal Mortgage & Equity | green | “(1) a material misrepresentation or omission by the defendant; (2) scienter; (3) a connection between the misrepresentation or omission and the purchase or sale of a security; (4) reliance upon the misrepresentation or omission; (5) economic loss; and (6) loss causation.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.