Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Aldo Tarallo.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Aldo Tarallo Anchor | green | “as is true of interpretation of statutes, the interpretation of an executive order begins with its text.” | 7 |
| 2 | United States v. McPherson | green | “has no license . . . to construe statutes in a way that 'undercuts the clearly expressed intent of congress.” | 4 |
| 3 | United States v. Murphy | green | “apply the same interpretive process when analyzing a rule promulgated by the president.” | 4 |
| 4 | United States v. Bartlett | green | “insofar as such regulations are not incon- sistent with the ucmj” | 3 |
| 5 | United States v. Pritt | green | “continually reiterated that the uniform code of military justice controls when an executive order conflicts with part of that code.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.