Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Harper v. Sheriff of Cook County.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Harper v. Sheriff of Cook County Anchor | green | “whether the length of the delay between the time the sheriff was noti- fied that bond had been posted and the time that the detainee was released was reasonable in any given case.” | 3 |
| 2 | People v. Stinger | green | “correctness of the court's determination has no bearing upon the initial question of jurisdiction.” | 3 |
| 3 | People v. Stinger | green | “power in the court to decide the particular matter pre- sented.” | 3 |
| 4 | Illinois Native American Bar Ass'n v. University of Illinois | green | “the act was not intended to create new rights” | 3 |
| 5 | Michael Driver v. Marion County Sheriff's Depar | green | “composed of persons for whom legal authority for detention has ceased, whether by acquittal after trial, release on recognizance bond, completion of jail time in the sentence, or otherwise.” | 3 |
| 6 | Michael Driver v. Marion County Sheriff's Depar | green | “to merely process the release.” | 3 |
| 7 | Rodriguez v. City of Chi. | green | “it appears there is no private right of action under article i, section 2.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.