Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Smith v. Barbour.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Smith v. Barbour Anchor | green | “whether an order is temporary or permanent in nature is a question of law, reviewed on appeal de novo.” | 7 |
| 2 | Woodring v. Woodring | green | “a trial court's designation of an order as 'temporary' or 'permanent' is neither dispositive nor binding on an appellate court.” | 5 |
| 3 | Senner v. Senner | green | “an order is temporary if either (1) it is entered without prejudice to either party, (2) it states a clear and specific reconvening time in the order and the time interval between the two hearings was reasonably brief; or (3) the order does not determine all the issues.” | 4 |
| 4 | Woodring v. Woodring | green | “the parties were before the court at least three times in the intervening period between the entry of the temporary order and the scheduled permanent custody hearing.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.