Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 147 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Loren Johnson v. Minnesota Historical Society.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Loren Johnson v. Minnesota Historical Society Anchor | green | “those rare instances where there is no dispute of fact and where there exists only one conclusion.” | 41 |
| 2 | Eric Crawford v. Marvin T. Runyon, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service | green | “summary judgment should seldom be used in employment-discrimination cases.” | 39 |
| 3 | Eric Crawford v. Marvin T. Runyon, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service | green | “bjecause discrimination cases often depend on inferences rather than on direct evidence, summary judgment should not be granted unless the evidence could not support any reasonable inference for the nonmovant.” | 27 |
| 4 | Victorija Smith v. St. Louis University, a Missouri Benevolent Corporation Operating as St. Louis University Hospital and School of Medicine | green | “summary judgments should only be used sparingly in employment discrimination cases,” | 24 |
| 5 | Chinyere Jenkins, Etc. v. State of Missouri | green | “because discrimination cases often turn on inferences rather than on direct evidence, we are particularly deferential to the nonmovant.” | 6 |
| 6 | Chinyere Jenkins, Etc. v. State of Missouri | green | “we must also keep in mind, as our court has previously cautioned, that summary judgment should be used sparingly in employment discrimination cases,” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.