Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Wilbanks v. Wilbanks.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wilbanks v. Wilbanks Anchor | green | “does not include the determination of custody of minor children.” | 3 |
| 2 | Rowell v. Rowell | green | “where no award of child custody is made in the final decree of divorce, the court has the power to reserve the issue of child custody and determine same at a subsequent term of court.” | 3 |
| 3 | GEORGIA RETAIL ASSOCIATION v. Georgia Public Service Commission | green | “matters to be considered on appeal . . . are limited to those which were urged before the trial court. cits.” | 3 |
| 4 | Banister v. Banister | green | “any language contained in a judgment which purports to make the custody award temporary or retain jurisdiction in the court to amend or modify the award has no effect.” | 3 |
| 5 | Brinson v. Jenkins | green | “where no award of child custody is made in the final decree of divorce, the court has the power to reserve the issue of child custody and determine same at a subsequent term of court.” | 3 |
| 6 | Robinson v. Ashmore | green | “transfer the question of the determination of custody and support to the juvenile court for . . . investigation and determination.” | 3 |
| 7 | Harris v. State | neutral | “inasmuch as all cases involving the constitutionality of any state law are solely within the jurisdiction of our supreme court and this case was transferred here, we deem that court to have determined that the constitutional issue was not properly raised or was otherwise not bef…” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.