Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Weston v. Carolina Research & Development Foundation.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Weston v. Carolina Research & Development Foundation Anchor | green | “under the south carolina freedom of information act); see also cain v. horne, 202 p.3d 1178, 1183 (ariz. 2009) (noting the parties did not dispute the funds at issue constituted” | 3 |
| 2 | Davis v. Richland County Council | green | “an interest greater than other potential plaintiffs.” | 3 |
| 3 | Gardner v. Board of Trustees of North Carolina Local Governmental Employees' Retirement System | green | “monies paid into the hands of the state treasurer by virtue of a state law become public funds for which the treasurer is responsible and may be disbursed only in accordance with legislative authority.” | 3 |
| 4 | Breeden v. S. C. Democratic Executive Committee | green | “is not only of public interest, but one which should be promptly decided” | 3 |
| 5 | Priester v. Cromer | green | “the preemption doctrine is rooted in the supremacy clause of the united states constitution . . . .” | 3 |
| 6 | Priester v. Cromer | green | “the purpose of congress is the ultimate touchstone of pre-emption analysis.” | 3 |
| 7 | Carnival Corp. v. Historic Ansonborough Neighborhood Ass'n | green | “whether public importance standing applies in a particular case turns on whether resolution of the dispute is needed for future guidance . . . . the need for future guidance generally dictates when public importance standing applies . . . .” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.