Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Independent Order of Foresters v. Chauvin.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Independent Order of Foresters v. Chauvin Anchor | green | “in the interest of orderly judicial administration.” | 6 |
| 2 | Hoskins v. Maricle | green | “the lower court is proceeding or is about to proceed outside of its jurisdiction and there is no remedy through an application to an intermediate court.” | 6 |
| 3 | Independent Order of Foresters v. Chauvin | green | “are truly extraordinary in nature and are reserved exclusively for those situations where litigants will be subjected to substantial injustice if they are required to proceed.” | 5 |
| 4 | Appalachian Racing, LLC Real Party in Interest v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, Kentucky Horse Racing Commission | green | “arbitrary, unreasonable, unfair, or unsupported by sound legal principles.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.