Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Jordan v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jordan v. State Anchor | green | “need not establish a prima facie case” | 9 |
| 2 | Reyes v. State | green | “raise matters not determinable from the record, upon which the accused could be entitled to relief.” | 6 |
| 3 | Flores v. State | green | “receive ineffective assistance simply because he relied on his attorneys' professional opinions and unsuccessful trial strategy.” | 3 |
| 4 | Lewis v. State | green | “an officer's suspicion of an alleged traffic violation, however, cannot be based on a mistaken understanding of traffic laws.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.