Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Cecchini.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Cecchini Anchor | green | “must ascertain that the defendant understands the nature of the charge, and that this must be done on the record at the plea hearing.” | 3 |
| 2 | State v. Denk | green | “these questions are tangential to our inquiry . . . .” | 3 |
| 3 | State v. Hatem M. Shata | green | “such a conviction will not necessarily result in deportation.” | 3 |
| 4 | State v. Cain | green | “cain, 342 wis. 2d 1, 24 . 2 no. 2014ap678, 2014ap679 2014ap680.dtp 75 our court adopted the” | 3 |
| 5 | State v. Cain | green | “if, in order to withdraw the plea, the defendant must show that deportation proceedings are underway, how does this standard fit in with the time limits for a motion to withdraw the plea?” | 3 |
| 6 | State v. Negrete | green | “negrete's affidavit also states that he is now subject to deportation proceedings.” | 3 |
| 7 | State v. Negrete | green | “exclusion from admission to this country or” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.