Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Aldrich v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Aldrich v. State Anchor | green | “absolute systemic requirements.” | 10 |
| 2 | In Re Commitment of Mullens | green | “behavioral abnormality means a congenital or acquired condition that by affecting a person's emotional or volitional capacity predisposes the person to commit a sexually violent offense to the extent that a person becomes a menace to the health and safety of another person.” | 5 |
| 3 | In Re Commitment of Shaw. | green | “deals only with violations of the requirements of the commitment order, not any prior criminal conduct.” | 3 |
| 4 | Stansbury v. State | green | “failure to register as a sex offender” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.