Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Smith.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Smith Anchor | green | “the evidence is so unreasonable, improbable, or unsatisfactory as to justify a reasonable doubt of defendant's guilt,” | 7 |
| 2 | People v. Taylor | green | “defendant neither had knowledge that the shooter intended to fire his gun upon exiting the vehicle nor made any effort to aid the shooter in the discharge of the weapon” | 4 |
| 3 | People v. Taylor | green | “the double jeopardy clause forbids a second trial for the purpose of affording the prosecution another opportunity to supply evidence which it failed to muster in the first proceeding.” | 4 |
| 4 | People v. Mocaby | green | “regardless of the nature of the evidence.” | 3 |
| 5 | People v. Spicer | green | “although a defendant's 'multipage and signed confession' can, by itself, be considered overwhelming evidence” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.