Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Kaeding.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Kaeding Anchor | green | “the parties actively participate without objection in proceedings which are inconsistent with the merits of the prior judgment.” | 7 |
| 2 | People v. Kaeding | green | “actively participate without objection in proceedings which are inconsistent with the merits of the prior judgment.” | 5 |
| 3 | People v. Montiel | green | “it is not consent but active participation that revests jurisdiction.” | 5 |
| 4 | People v. Kaeding | green | “litigants may revest a court which has general jurisdiction over the matter with both personal and subject matter jurisdiction over the particular cause after the 30-day period following final judgment during which post-judgment motions must ordinarily be filed.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.