Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Mycogen Seeds v. Sands.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mycogen Seeds v. Sands Anchor | green | “irrational, illogical, or wholly unjustifiable.” | 12 |
| 2 | Lakeside Casino v. Blue | green | “the interpretation of workers' compensation statutes and related case law has not been clearly vested by a provision of law in the discretion of the agency.” | 5 |
| 3 | Mycogen Seeds v. Sands | green | “clearly vested by a provision of law in the discretion of the agency,” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.