Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Howard Gunty Profit Sharing Plan v. Superior Court.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Howard Gunty Profit Sharing Plan v. Superior Court Anchor | green | “duty to exercise control over the class action to protect the rights of all parties, and to prevent abuse which might undermine the proper administration of justice.” | 3 |
| 2 | McCall v. Superior Court | green | “action for a judicial rescission” | 3 |
| 3 | McCall v. Superior Court | green | “legal rescission. . .the act of plaintiff in avoiding the contract reinvests him with his legal title or right to sue, and must therefore be accompanied with restitution of the thing received by him.” | 3 |
| 4 | Philpott v. Superior Court | green | “a judgment of rescission in this cause would be entirely superfluous” | 3 |
| 5 | Village Northridge Homeowners Assn. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. | green | “codified much of carruth's rule” | 3 |
| 6 | Matteson v. Wagoner | green | “restoration cannot be made without injuriously affecting the rights of the party seeking rescission” | 3 |
| 7 | Guifu Li v. A Perfect Day Franchise, Inc. | green | “misleading or coercive communications to putative or certified class members concerning the litigation threaten to undermine the fairness of the litigation process, the adequacy of representation, and the administration of justice generally” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.