Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 146 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Thomas Jefferson University v. Shalala.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Thomas Jefferson University v. Shalala Anchor | green | “controlling weight unless it is plainly erroneous or inconsistent with the regulation.” | 52 |
| 2 | Thomas Jefferson University v. Shalala | green | “plainly erroneous or inconsistent with the regulation.” | 41 |
| 3 | Thomas Jefferson University v. Shalala | green | “we must give substantial deference to an agency's interpretation of its own regulations.” | 26 |
| 4 | Wyoming Outdoor Council v. United States Forest Service | green | “so long as an agency's interpretation of ambiguous regulatory language is reasonable, it should be given effect.” | 12 |
| 5 | Memorial Hospital/adair County Health Center, Inc. v. Otis R. Bowen, M.D., Secretary of Health & Human Services | green | “while the substantial evidence test concerns support in the record for the agency action under review, the arbitrary and capricious standard is a broader test subsuming the substantial evidence test but also encompassing adherence to agency precedent.” | 7 |
| 6 | Memorial Hospital/adair County Health Center, Inc. v. Otis R. Bowen, M.D., Secretary of Health & Human Services | green | “unsupported by substantial evidence in a case ... otherwise reviewed on the record of an agency hearing provided by statute.” | 5 |
| 7 | Memorial Hospital/adair County Health Center, Inc. v. Otis R. Bowen, M.D., Secretary of Health & Human Services | green | “unsupported by substantial evidence in a case . . . otherwise reviewed on the record of an agency hearing provided by statute.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.