Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Frost Ex Rel. Anderson v. Whitbeck.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Frost Ex Rel. Anderson v. Whitbeck Anchor | green | “or others test for, monitor, clean up, remove, contain, treat, detoxify, neutralize, or in any way respond to or assess the effects of pollutants, chemicals, liquids, or gases. 128 on its face, this exclusion can be read to negate all coverage provided by the endorsement, render…” | 3 |
| 2 | Olsen v. Moore | green | “the other wells, it cannot be said the seepage was” | 3 |
| 3 | Frederick W. Preisler v. Kuettel's Septic Service, LLC | green | “under the pollution exclusion clause in their farmowners policy. 77 if the pollution exclusion clause bars coverage, then the court must interpret two other policy provisions: the incidental coverages section and the farm chemicals limited liability endorsement. 78 the extent of…” | 3 |
| 4 | Space v. Farm Family Mutual Insurance | neutral | “the substance has leached into the groundwater and contaminated a well.” | 3 |
| 5 | Space v. Farm Family Mutual Insurance | neutral | “damages resulting from the application of manure to cropland may be excluded from coverage under the policy.” | 3 |
| 6 | Hirschhorn v. Auto-Owners Insurance | green | “a unique and largely undesirable substance that is commonly understood to be harmful.” | 3 |
| 7 | Wilson Mutual Insurance v. Falk | green | “to 'consider the nature of the substance involved' in order to determine whether a pollution exclusion precluded coverage.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.