Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Finke v. Hunter's View, Ltd..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Finke v. Hunter's View, Ltd. Anchor | green | “the plaintiff's action cannot reach a manufacturer or the manufacturer is insolvent.” | 3 |
| 2 | Chraca v. U.S. Battery Manufacturing Company | green | “unable to satisfy any judgment” | 3 |
| 3 | Chraca v. U.S. Battery Manufacturing Company | green | “authority indicating that in a section 2-621 proceeding, a company is deemed 'unable to satisfy any judgment' when it is bankrupt or nonexistent” | 3 |
| 4 | Chraca v. U.S. Battery Manufacturing Company | green | “recognize or enforce a judgment obtained in an american state court,” | 3 |
| 5 | Cassidy v. China Vitamins, LLC | green | “unable to satisfy any judgment” | 3 |
| 6 | Cassidy v. China Vitamins, LLC | green | “actually considered the effect a manufacturer's judgment-proof status would have on the plaintiff's total recovery.” | 3 |
| 7 | In re Marriage of Goesel | green | “each word, clause, and sentence of a statute must be given a reasonable construction, if possible, and should not be rendered superfluous” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.