Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 146 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Miguel Angel Iturribarria v. Immigration and Naturalization Service.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Miguel Angel Iturribarria v. Immigration and Naturalization Service Anchor | green | “when a petitioner is prevented from filing because of deception, fraud, or error, as long as the petitioner acts with due diligence” | 104 |
| 2 | Miguel Angel Iturribarria v. Immigration and Naturalization Service | green | “petitioner is prevented from filing because of deception, fraud, or error, as long as the petitioner acts with due diligence” | 17 |
| 3 | Jose Alberto Valeriano v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General | green | “the party's ignorance of the necessary information must have been caused by circumstances beyond the party's control.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.