Topic: almost identical to the allegations within roszak, · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #19991

7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Pekin Insurance Company v. CSR Roofing Contractors, Inc..

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Pekin Insurance Company v. CSR Roofing Contractors, Inc. Anchor
illappct · 2015
green “almost identical to the allegations within roszak,” 3
2 Pekin Insurance Company v. CSR Roofing Contractors, Inc.
illappct · 2015
green “because it could potentially be found vicariously liable for” 3
3 Pekin Insurance Company v. Roszak/ADC
illappct · 2010
green “sufficient control so as to be vicariously liable for the subcontractor's negligence.” 3
4 Illinois Emcasco Insurance Company v. Waukegan Steel Sales, Inc.
illappct · 2013
green “almost identical to the allegations within roszak,” 3
5 Pekin Insurance Company v. Illinois Cement Company, LLC
illappct · 2016
green “constructed, maintained, placed or operated, or caused to be erected, constructed, maintained, placed or operated, a certain set of stairs,” 3
6 Cathay Bank v. Accetturo
illappct · 2016
green “an act that must be performed or an event that must occur before a contract becomes effective or before one party to an existing contract is obligated to perform” 3

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check