Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Hartford Courant Co. v. Pellegrino.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hartford Courant Co. v. Pellegrino Anchor | green | “neither statute outlining the authority of the administrators provides for either defendant to vacate sealing orders.” | 3 |
| 2 | Hartford Courant Co. v. Pellegrino | green | “the authority or the power to provide the plaintiffs with the relief they seek.” | 3 |
| 3 | Tobin v. Knaggs | green | “that files in the possession of the clerk of the criminal court of the city of new york are public records which may be fully examined by any person, unless the papers have been sealed from public scrutiny by the court or by the terms of a statute” | 3 |
| 4 | Paolella v. Estate of Paolella | green | “in granting the times's application to create a new file, the court exercised direct authority over the underlying cases, which had the same effect as restoring those cases to the docket.” | 3 |
| 5 | Paolella v. Estate of Paolella | green | “interpretation of the statute governing the time to open a judgment or to restore a case to the docket as an absolute bar to requests for modification of sealing or protective orders in cases withdrawn more than four months earlier renders the statute unconstitutional under the …” | 3 |
| 6 | Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp. | green | “create a new file to address its pending motion seeking to vacate sealing and protective orders entered in twenty-three lawsuits alleging sexual abuse of minors by clergymen.” | 3 |
| 7 | Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp. | green | “that issue was not specifically raised on appeal.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.