Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Archer v. Farmer Bros. Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Archer v. Farmer Bros. Co. Anchor | green | “a trial court is given broad discretion to determine who is a prevailing party in multiple claim cases because of its unique opportunity to observe the course of the litigation.” | 6 |
| 2 | JW CONST. CO., INC. v. Elliott | green | “to preserve an argument as to why a particular decision is appropriate, a party must timely raise that specific argument.” | 3 |
| 3 | Olson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. | green | “there is little doubt, based upon the evidence presented to this court to date, that efforts were made to prevent the individuals who had entered into purchase contracts from finding out about the developer's intentions and efforts to create the district and the related tax liab…” | 3 |
| 4 | Cacioppo v. EAGLE COUNTY SCHOOL DIS. | green | “however, because this claim goes to the information provided in the constitutionally required notice and not the ballot title, we determine that section 1-11-203.5 is inapplicable and does not bar the claim.” | 3 |
| 5 | Cacioppo v. EAGLE COUNTY SCHOOL DIS. | green | “is permissible as long as it does not directly or indirectly impair, limit, or destroy the rights that tabor provides” | 3 |
| 6 | Cacioppo v. EAGLE COUNTY SCHOOL DIS. | green | “not argue that the district was without legal or constitutional authority to raise the tax” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.