Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Texas v. Ysleta Del Sur Pueblo.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Texas v. Ysleta Del Sur Pueblo Anchor | green | “the restoration act allows the state of texas to bring suit in federal court to enjoin any such violations of the restoration act.” | 3 |
| 2 | Texas v. Ysleta Del Sur Pueblo | green | “after the attorney general filed an amended complaint, the district court, by its order of january 13, 2002, overruled another motion to dismiss, concluding that the attorney general had the authority to bring this action.” | 3 |
| 3 | Alabama-Coushatta Tribes of Texas v. Texas | green | “the injunction sought by the state of texas is authorized by both state and federal statutes.” | 3 |
| 4 | Jesus Mercado v. Loretta Lynch | green | “for a supreme court decision to satisfy the rule of orderliness, it must be unequivocal, not a mere 'hint' of how the court might rule in the future.” | 3 |
| 5 | Eleanor Crose v. Humana Insurance Company | green | “we are free to disregard dicta from prior panel opinions when we find it unpersuasive.” | 3 |
| 6 | State of Texas v. Alabama-Coushatta Tribe of TX | green | “if the pueblo wishes to vitiate the gaming provisions of the restoration act, it will have to petition congress to amend or repeal the restoration act rather than merely comply with the procedures of igra.” | 3 |
| 7 | State of Texas v. Alabama-Coushatta Tribe of TX | green | “the restoration act is still in effect.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.