Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from SEC v. Gary S. Williky.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SEC v. Gary S. Williky Anchor | green | “the record contains no evidence upon which the court could have rationally based its decision; the decision is based on an erroneous conclusion of law; the decision is based on clearly erroneous factual find- ings; or the decision clearly appears arbitrary.” | 3 |
| 2 | United States v. DISH Network L.L.C. | green | “ba- ses civil damages and penalties on harm done.” | 3 |
| 3 | United States v. DISH Network L.L.C. | green | “entirely on dish's ability to pay.” | 3 |
| 4 | Federal Trade Commission v. Andris Pukke | green | “seek injunctions framed 'broadly enough to prevent defendants from engaging in similarly illegal practices in future adver- tisements.” | 3 |
| 5 | Fed. Trade Comm'n v. Moses | green | “admitted to having the power to hire and reprimand employees including those responsible for the corporate defendants' violations.” | 3 |
| 6 | United States v. Z Inv. Properties, LLC | green | “the record contains no evidence upon which the court could have rationally based its decision; the decision is based on an erroneous conclusion of law; the decision is based on clearly erroneous factual find- ings; or the decision clearly appears arbitrary.” | 3 |
| 7 | Denis Navratil v. City of Racine | green | “construing the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving partes.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.