Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Krenning v. Heart Mountain Irrigation District.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Krenning v. Heart Mountain Irrigation District Anchor | green | “attempt to determine the legislature's intent based primarily on the plain and ordinary meaning of the words used in the statute.” | 8 |
| 2 | State Department of Corrections v. Watts | green | “to determine whether the legislature intended that immunity be waived for a particular claim and will not resort to reliance upon previous unsupported and unnecessary suggestions that the act is to be interpreted either liberally or strictly.” | 6 |
| 3 | State Department of Corrections v. Watts | green | “matters not falling within its express provisions.” | 4 |
| 4 | Sinclair v. City of Gillette | green | “provides broad governmental immunity from tort liability.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.