Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Shrum v. Cooke.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shrum v. Cooke Anchor | green | “(1) the defendant caused the plaintiff's continued confinement or prosecution; (2) the original action terminated in favor of the plaintiff; (3) no probable cause supported the arrest, confinement, or prosecution; (4) the defendant acted maliciously; and (5) the plaintiff sustai…” | 14 |
| 2 | Myers v. Koopman | green | “if plaintiff's detention occurred before he received legal process, he can assert a claim for false imprisonment.” | 4 |
| 3 | Bledsoe v. Vanderbilt | green | “since a detective who fabricates evidence during the preliminary investigation of a crime 'is entitled to qualified immunity,' prosecutors who do the same are likewise 'protected only by qualified immunity.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.