Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from S.S. v. Bullie.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | S.S. v. Bullie Anchor | green | “there is a compelling reason not to wait for an appeal.” | 3 |
| 2 | Anniston HMA, LLC v. Uhakheme | green | “appellate review of an order granting a motion to dismiss a claim ... is not by way of a petition for a writ of mandamus but by an appeal governed by the strictures of rule 54(b).” | 3 |
| 3 | Anniston HMA, LLC v. Uhakheme | green | “were this court to begin granting mandamus review of orders granting motions to dismiss a claim, we would effectively nullify rule 54(b), circumventing the conditions for such review prescribed by that rule, tempting trial courts to postpone consideration of remaining claims unt…” | 3 |
| 4 | Lighting Fair, Inc. v. Rosenberg | green | “purchased and sold on an 'as-is, where is' basis, with all faults and limitations, and without recourse, and without warranty or representation, express or implied, of any type, kind, character or nature.” | 3 |
| 5 | Lighting Fair, Inc. v. Rosenberg | green | “under the facts in this case because the issues raised in the mandamus petition may be mooted by future developments in the shelby circuit court here, rule 54(b) certification would not lead to an” | 3 |
| 6 | Council v. Estate of Skelton (Ex Parte Skelton) | green | “a party wishing to challenge a trial court's order granting a motion to dismiss some, but not all, claims under the abatement statute 38 sc-2024-0284; sc-2024-0318; sc-2024-0349 should attempt do so by way of a rule 54(b) appeal before seeking mandamus relief.” | 3 |
| 7 | Council v. Estate of Skelton (Ex Parte Skelton) | green | “mandamus is the appropriate remedy to correct a trial court's failure to properly apply 6-5-440.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.