Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Wood.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Wood Anchor | green | “trial counsel's failure to file a motion to suppress or object to agent raschke's testimony on this basis constituted plain error, warranting reversal and remand for a new trial.” | 3 |
| 2 | People v. Rexroad | green | “the principal contested issue relevant to defendant's culpability was whether he had the intent to defraud” | 3 |
| 3 | People v. Robinson | green | “to go from one place to another with intent secretly to confine her against her will.” | 3 |
| 4 | People v. Ortiz | green | “the suspected perpetrator shall not be substantially different in appearance from the fillers based on the eyewitness's previous description of the perpetrator or based on other factors that would draw attention to the suspected perpetrator” | 3 |
| 5 | People v. Carey | green | “is sufficient if it notified the defendant of the precise offense charged with enough specificity to allow the defendant to (1) prepare his or her defense and (2) plead a resulting conviction as a bar to future prosecution arising out of the same conduct.” | 3 |
| 6 | People v. Carey | green | “while the instructions given were technically legally correct ipi instructions, the jury was not accurately instructed on the law as it related to the offense charged in the indictment.” | 3 |
| 7 | People v. Joiner | green | “the suspected perpetrator shall not be substantially different in appearance from the fillers based on the eyewitness's previous description of the perpetrator or based on other factors that would draw attention to the suspected perpetrator” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.