Topic: the adequacy of the pretrial investigation ... was clearly … · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #20146

7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Teshome Campbell v. Dan Reardon.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Teshome Campbell v. Dan Reardon Anchor
ca7 · 2015
green “the adequacy of the pretrial investigation ... was clearly established under strickland as the critical threshold question ... .” 3
2 Logan Gaylord v. United States
ca7 · 2016
green “all lawyers that represent criminal defend- ants are expected to know the laws applicable to their client's defense.” 3
3 Logan Gaylord v. United States
ca7 · 2016
green “allege facts that, if proven, 14 no. 19-1257 would entitle him to relief.” 3
4 Gilbert Spiller v. United States
ca7 · 2017
green “if the petitioner makes allegations that are 'vague, conclusory, or palpably incredible,' rather than 'detailed and specific.” 3
5 Jesus Arreola-Castillo v. United States
ca7 · 2018
green “acci- dentally forfeited a timeliness argument, our power to de- cide an appeal on a forfeited ground should be used only in exceptional cases.” 3
6 Jesus Arreola-Castillo v. United States
ca7 · 2018
green “it typically takes a district court more time to de- cide a habeas case on the merits, than it does to resolve a pe- tition on threshold procedural grounds.” 3
7 United States v. Harden
ca7 · 2018
green “within some hours' after injecting heroin, depending on the potency of the drug” 3

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check