Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Beall v. Holloway-Johnson.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Beall v. Holloway-Johnson Anchor | green | “any evidence, no matter how slight, legally sufficient to generate a jury question” | 3 |
| 2 | Sage Title Group, LLC v. Roman | green | “shall state with particularity all reasons why the motion should be granted.” | 3 |
| 3 | Sage Title Group, LLC v. Roman | green | “the trial judge 'could identify, through a process analogous to incorporation by reference, the argument that was being made in support of the motion.” | 3 |
| 4 | Westfield Insurance v. Gilliam | green | “sometimes called the 'one recovery rule.” | 3 |
| 5 | Jones v. Pohanka Auto North, Inc. | green | “a contract exists . . . that covers the same subject matter as the unjust enrichment claim. plaintiffs argue that they can plead in the alternative. . . . but nowhere in the complaint do plaintiffs actually allege bad faith in the formation of the contract.” | 3 |
| 6 | Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Apex Oil Co. | green | “although a plaintiff 'may not recover under both contract and quasi-contract theories, a plaintiff is not barred from pleading these theories in the alternative where the existence of a contract concerning the subject matter is in dispute.” | 3 |
| 7 | Randolph v. New England Mutual Life Insurance | green | “three causes of action, the first and second causes being on a contract and the third cause being upon the quantum meruit.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.