Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Jones.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Jones Anchor | green | “the reviewing court cannot say that they did not contribute to the defendant's conviction.” | 3 |
| 2 | People v. Barnes | green | “it is 'entirely appropriate' to consult the dictionaries.” | 3 |
| 3 | People v. Rivera | green | “running around with little superman outfits under their uniforms.” | 3 |
| 4 | People v. Rivera | green | “the believability of the officers' anticipated testimony.” | 3 |
| 5 | People v. Rivera | green | “the police officers' credibility in general.” | 3 |
| 6 | State v. Ceballos | green | “inflammatory emotional appeal to the passions and prejudices of the jury” | 3 |
| 7 | State v. Ceballos | green | “to believe that pure evil, satan's daughter, appeared in this courtroom” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.