Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Tomlinson v. Metropolitan Pediatrics, LLC.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tomlinson v. Metropolitan Pediatrics, LLC Anchor | green | “a direct physician-patient relationship can be one ground for creat- ing affirmative protections of a plaintiff's economic and emo- tional interests under negligence law.” | 3 |
| 2 | Tomlinson v. Metropolitan Pediatrics, LLC | green | “had identifiable interests that defendants were legally obligated to protect under the facts alleged in their respective claims.” | 3 |
| 3 | Sloan v. Providence Health System-Oregon | green | “the fact that physicians have a specified duty of care does not mean that foreseeability is irrelevant in medical negligence cases.” | 3 |
| 4 | Moody v. Oregon Community Credit Union | green | “was within the class of persons” | 3 |
| 5 | Stone v. Witt | green | “an actor's conduct creates a risk when the actor's conduct or course of conduct results in greater risk to another than the other would have cite as 331 or app 722 (2024) 733 faced absent the conduct.” | 3 |
| 6 | Stone v. Witt | green | “was negli- gent in prescribing xanax to shonkwiler when she presented symptoms of 'psychotic illness, depression, chronic bipolar cite as 331 or app 722 (2024) 731 mental disorder and chronic drug use,' and in authorizing the refill of that prescription.” | 3 |
| 7 | Scott v. Kesselring | green | “whether the defendant's conduct unrea- sonably created a foreseeable risk of the subsequent conduct by witt, and the type of harm that resulted from it.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.