Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Andersen.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Andersen Anchor | green | “the only aspect of the interrogation that presented any concern as to whether the defendant's statements were voluntary, apart from the failure to give miranda warnings, was when sergeant schneider loudly accused her of lying.” | 3 |
| 2 | Zylstra v. State | green | “thus, judicial remarks during the course of a trial that are critical or disapproving of, or even hostile to, counsel, the parties, or their cases, ordinarily do not support a bias or partiality challenge.” | 3 |
| 3 | Idaho Dep't of Health & Welfare v. Jane Doe (In re Doe I) | green | “even attempted to demonstrate that an abuse of discretion occurred under any part of the four-part standard applied by this court,” | 3 |
| 4 | Idaho Dep't of Health & Welfare v. Jane Doe (In re Doe I) | green | “the party asserting the abuse of discretion carries the burden of demonstrating that an abuse of discretion occurred, and a failure to do so is fatal to its argument.” | 3 |
| 5 | Jones v. Chappell | green | “should have been on appellate counsel's radar.” | 3 |
| 6 | State v. Bartol | green | “maintaining his death sentence would allow the execution of a person for conduct that the legislature has determined no longer justifies that unique and ultimate punishment.” | 3 |
| 7 | State v. Dempsey | green | “the error, if any, was invited.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.