Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 20 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from John A. Francis v. City of Meriden.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | John A. Francis v. City of Meriden Anchor | green | “regarded as having such an impairment.” | 4 |
| 2 | Chevron Corp. v. Redmon | green | “must be one which is generally perceived as severely limiting the plaintiff in performing work-related functions in general.” | 4 |
| 3 | Hamilton v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. | green | “we have noted that 'the eeoc regulations provide that temporary, non-chronic impairments of short duration, with little or no permanent long-term impact, are usually not disabilities.” | 3 |
| 4 | Gutridge v. Clure | green | “the ada requires permanent or long-term impairment” | 3 |
| 5 | Mary D. Pollard v. High's of Baltimore, Incorporated | green | “if an individual's ability to correct an impairment must be considered, it seems clear that the individual's likelihood of recovery from a temporary impairment must also be considered.” | 3 |
| 6 | Garcia v. Allen | green | “in determining if one is substantially limited in a major life activity," one factor to consider is the "duration or expected duration of the impairment.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.