Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Gerberding v. Munro.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gerberding v. Munro Anchor | green | “we are not swayed in our analysis of the term limits initiative by the policy merits or demerits of term limits for officeholders” | 3 |
| 2 | Washington State Legislature v. State | green | “a budget bill, by its nature, appropriates funds for a finite time period-two years.” | 3 |
| 3 | Federal Way School District No. 210 v. State | green | “completely new and different funding mechanism” | 3 |
| 4 | Lummi Indian Nation v. State | green | “a facial challenge must be rejected if there are any circumstances where the statute can constitutionally be applied.” | 3 |
| 5 | League of Education Voters v. State | green | “where the initiative passed by the people contains a severability clause, the court may view this as 'conclusive as to the circumstances asserted unless it can be said that the declaration is obviously false on its face.” | 3 |
| 6 | School District No. 20 v. Bryan | green | “out of the funds available for the support of the common schools” | 3 |
| 7 | State ex rel. City of Seattle v. Seattle Electric Co. | neutral | “measuring the limit of legislative power by reference to the constitution” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.