Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Albert Woodson.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Albert Woodson Anchor | green | “did not alter the terms of imprisonment specified in subsections 841(b)(1)(a)(iii) and (b)(iii), it did alter the amounts of crack cocaine required to trigger those terms.” | 3 |
| 2 | United States v. Albert Woodson | green | “modified the statutory penalties applicable to a violation of a federal criminal statute established as part of the offense of conviction.” | 3 |
| 3 | United States v. Albert Woodson | green | “modified the statutory penalties of 21 u.s.c. 841 (b)(1)(c) as it pertains to crack cocaine offenses, such that a conviction for trafficking crack cocaine pursuant to that statute is a 'covered offense.” | 3 |
| 4 | United States v. Gilliam | green | “21 u.s.c. 848(e)(1)(a), is not a 'covered offense' under section 404(b) of the first step act” | 3 |
| 5 | Terry v. United States | green | “never an element under subparagraph c” | 3 |
| 6 | Terry v. United States | green | “on the statutory penalties for petitioner's offense, not the statute or statutory scheme” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.