Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Szyszkowski.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Szyszkowski Anchor | green | “any alleged prosecutorial misconduct was not so pervasive or egregious as to deprive defendant of a fair trial” | 9 |
| 2 | People v. Perez | green | “was not received for its truth, but instead was received for the legitimate, nonhearsay purpose of completing the narrative of events and explaining police actions” | 3 |
| 3 | People v. Kelly | green | “sandoval compromise . . . reflects a proper exercise of the court's discretion” | 3 |
| 4 | People v. Cooper | neutral | “those designated in the felony complaint” | 3 |
| 5 | People v. Fontanez | green | “a compromise verdict is not a ground for reversal provided the verdict is not repugnant” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.