Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Clare v. Town of Hudson.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Clare v. Town of Hudson Anchor | green | “in the context of the overall statutory scheme and not in isolation,” | 3 |
| 2 | Conservation Law Foundation v. PSNH | green | “two statutory provisions containing similar or identical language are not necessarily subject to the same interpretation, as there are other interpretive factors such as the purpose and context of the legislation, and legislative history.” | 3 |
| 3 | Galvin, et al. v. EMC Mortgage Corporation, et al. | green | “new hampshire law recognizes the general rule that a debtor cannot interpose defects or objections to an assignment which merely render the assignment voidable at the election of the assignor or those standing in his shoes.” | 3 |
| 4 | Galvin, et al. v. EMC Mortgage Corporation, et al. | green | “plainly intended that the mortgage would not follow the note,” | 3 |
| 5 | Moore, et al. V. MERS, et al. | green | “the instrument when issued or negotiated to the holder must not bear such apparent evidence of forgery or alteration or must not otherwise be so irregular or incomplete as to call into question its authenticity.” | 3 |
| 6 | LeDoux v. JP Morgan Chase N.A., et al. | green | “is a negotiable instrument subject to the provisions of article 3 of the uniform commercial code ('ucc').” | 3 |
| 7 | Dennis v. Town of Loudon, et al. | green | “to apply statutes in light of the legislature's intent in enacting them.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.