Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 20 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Central Transport, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Central Transport, Inc. Anchor | green | “trust documents cannot excuse trustees from their duties under erisa.” | 7 |
| 2 | Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Central Transport, Inc. | green | “trust documents cannot excuse trustees from their duties under erisa” | 6 |
| 3 | Metzler v. Graham | green | “we think it is entirely appropriate for a fiduciary to consider the time horizon over which the plan will be required to pay out benefits in evaluating the risk of large loss from an investment strategy.” | 4 |
| 4 | Liss v. Smith | green | “the power to appoint and remove trustees carries with it the concomitant duty to monitor those trustees' performance.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.