Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 20 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Hancock v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hancock v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co. Anchor | green | “a plaintiff may rest on the well-pled facts in the complaint to oppose a motion to dismiss for improper venue, but 'only to the extent that such facts are uncontroverted by defendant's' evidence.” | 8 |
| 2 | Oklahoma v. Texas | green | “the boundary is on and along that bank at the mean level of the water, when it washes the bank without overflowing it.” | 4 |
| 3 | Oklahoma v. Texas | green | “the chief point of difference between the parties was that oklahoma and the united states were claiming the south bank of the river as the boundary, while texas was contending for the thread or middle of the stream.” | 4 |
| 4 | State of Oklahoma v. State of Texas. United States, Intervener | green | “to identify the south bank boundary line” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.