Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 20 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Square D Co. v. Niagara Frontier Tariff Bureau, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Square D Co. v. Niagara Frontier Tariff Bureau, Inc. Anchor | green | “investigated and approved by the icc.” | 5 |
| 2 | Arizona Grocery Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. | green | “under the act the shipper was bound to pay the legal rate; but if he could show that it was unreasonable he might recover reparation.” | 3 |
| 3 | Security Services, Inc. v. Kmart Corp. | green | “we have held these provisions 'to create strict filed rate requirements and to forbid equitable defenses to collection of the filed tariff.” | 3 |
| 4 | E. & J. GALLO WINERY v. EnCana Corp. | green | “any particular form of regulation in its quest to ensure reasonable rates.” | 3 |
| 5 | E. & J. GALLO WINERY v. EnCana Corp. | green | “reviewed the natural gas market and determined it was competitive,” | 3 |
| 6 | E. & J. GALLO WINERY v. EnCana Corp. | green | “such rates are just and reasonable as a matter of law.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.